{"id":"W4212996214","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127646","title":"Are spatial distribution and aggregation of wetlands reliable indicators of stream flow mitigation?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Federation of Canadian Municipalities","keywords":"Wetland; Watershed; Environmental science; Riparian zone; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecosystem services; Water resource management; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Ecology; Habitat; Geology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005403911,0.0002844331,0.0005823472,0.001610584,0.0003885696,0.00101782,0.0007694912,0.001125788,0.001566987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02377505,0.0003539184,0.0004083083,0.002539681,0.001115576,0.00247571,0.0006186385,0.0004905519,0.0003549104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000338395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004163829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004869607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01056519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978929,0.001036585,0.0002055816,0.000382952,0.0002907682,0.0001912848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711566,0.01198348,0.01112875,0.002622253,0.002541199,0.0005677509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001139504,0.0000288681,0.9870581,0.0000200911,0.0001294213,0.0000194205,0.00009412511,0.0004568691,0.0004830626,0.0001805463,0.0003522835,0.01106317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008514837,0.00006320992,0.9958934,0.00000964908,0.00005522155,0.00007655786,0.0003898272,0.0021308,0.0003329292,0.0006735001,0.0003571468,0.000009265547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939116,0.0005519053,0.00264164,0.0005490562,0.00003838892,0.000008307469,0.0005491023,0.00002039569,0.001729633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998693,0.0001177386,0.0008530717,0.00003268608,0.00004817532,0.000006902556,0.0001474657,0.000004340743,0.00009656686],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005403911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02857894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004172228036090144,"score_gpt":0.2025858850382419,"score_spread":0.1984136570021518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}