{"id":"W4213021128","doi":"10.1080/07011784.2022.2032365","title":"Screening and scoping-level assessment of beneficial management practices in a Canadian prairie watershed","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Global Institute for Water Security; Water Security Agency; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Water Security Agency","keywords":"Watershed; Environmental planning; Watershed management; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Geography; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01127725,0.0007145726,0.0006479803,0.004415109,0.002150623,0.0030205,0.001770174,0.0006533745,0.0006315383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01745682,0.0004018377,0.001133526,0.004128763,0.001125321,0.001027583,0.001624422,0.0002981707,0.00006103155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0218473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04275769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8024836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9128829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966308,0.001036664,0.0002864435,0.0003346262,0.001285516,0.0004258782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915767,0.00352044,0.0009753651,0.000249914,0.003489336,0.0001883847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003133803,0.0004438894,0.4326144,0.003595197,0.0006194081,0.001587988,0.01517854,0.2126214,0.01134162,0.005210428,0.001864757,0.314609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009697337,0.001188283,0.575822,0.002277986,0.001366398,0.0002199597,0.04404951,0.3437249,0.01060642,0.004472798,0.01593098,0.0002438752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764162,0.0007328668,0.007872631,0.0004373633,0.000003798359,0.002087134,0.0009886486,0.00006423149,0.01139713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638422,0.00110371,0.03217592,0.00004449772,0.000001492581,0.0005334961,0.00090963,0.000007067066,0.00138203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1975164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3973593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02639287441693461,"score_gpt":0.245568964426262,"score_spread":0.2191760900093274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}