{"id":"W4213230451","doi":"10.1121/1.4799210","title":"Spectral probability density as a tool for marine ambient noise analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of meetings on acoustics","topic":"Seismic Waves and Analysis","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Ambient noise level; Spectral density; Noise (video); Acoustics; Computer science; Underwater; Geophone; Remote sensing; Outlier; Probability density function; Subsea; Seismic noise; Environmental science; Geology; Telecommunications; Marine engineering; Seismology; Engineering; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Mathematics; Oceanography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005445384,0.0002079288,0.0004457784,0.0002094524,0.0001371714,0.0001207347,0.0002707453,0.00008960159,0.001001245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007911666,0.0001692819,0.0002847923,0.0007712133,0.0000968176,0.0001684502,0.00003184336,0.0001306889,0.00006014964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001423354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000276361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002632077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004690458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982904,0.000005478786,0.0004464858,0.0004407978,0.0004172046,0.0003996683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985933,0.0001713839,0.000317284,0.0001196101,0.000647273,0.0001511888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001598688,0.0001845638,0.9758791,0.0002512233,0.0004923011,9.120489e-7,0.0001547075,0.005657928,0.008651175,0.0004828374,0.002269303,0.005816127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003713471,0.0005305415,0.8007089,0.00002576353,0.001202887,0.00000282104,0.0004120574,0.1776593,0.00444987,0.01410232,0.0001824622,0.0003516715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947799,0.000008852406,0.0002121224,0.0004724843,0.00005602363,0.0004734331,0.00004615789,0.00004760121,0.003903444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847901,0.00002636995,0.01419625,0.0003810675,0.000117855,0.00000675576,0.00005158864,0.000006142179,0.0004238461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1751701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009338735544430335,"score_gpt":0.207186542311625,"score_spread":0.1978478067671947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}