{"id":"W4214690488","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131056","title":"A framework for specifying low-carbon construction materials in government procurement: A case study for concrete in a new building investment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cleaner Production","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"National Research Council Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Procurement; Benchmarking; Carbon footprint; Greenhouse gas; Government (linguistics); Environmental economics; Investment (military); Process (computing); Embodied energy; Business; Civil engineering; Computer science; Engineering; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007441358,0.001273378,0.0007040516,0.002437923,0.003211326,0.01017765,0.003420561,0.004869965,0.008569816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01096393,0.001493538,0.002271238,0.002646069,0.005656852,0.007132915,0.003492688,0.004027708,0.001278337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005714825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007915256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04825754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07126827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948613,0.002923811,0.0005283438,0.0003886916,0.0007560298,0.0005417983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916747,0.005671611,0.000412922,0.0008341993,0.001032244,0.0003742919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003100857,0.00009388116,0.0008866836,0.0001216899,0.00002061892,0.001008032,0.002865392,0.05315716,0.001417267,0.9281177,0.001435121,0.01084532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009812973,0.00008724735,0.0006061425,0.0004601628,0.00008949498,0.0008457719,0.006403874,0.3150792,0.005095968,0.5738506,0.09723011,0.0001533589],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02346215,0.0002215369,0.9420701,0.002221806,0.00004120735,0.0004700121,0.0005775087,0.0006253753,0.03031031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2534149,0.0002205892,0.7394375,0.0002440917,0.0000178237,0.0004687667,0.0005703266,0.000260755,0.005365186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04825754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09595329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02680369473292668,"score_gpt":0.2814356404580271,"score_spread":0.2546319457251004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}