{"id":"W4220653535","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22207","title":"Methodology matters when estimating deer abundance: a global systematic review and recommendations for improvements","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"NSW Department of Primary Industries","keywords":"Odocoileus; Capreolus; Abundance (ecology); Roe deer; Abundance estimation; Distance sampling; Mark and recapture; Aerial survey; Camera trap; Ecology; Statistics; Geography; Environmental science; Wildlife; Biology; Cartography; Demography; Mathematics; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002532427,0.0001050179,0.0003543451,0.00004097956,0.0003013856,0.00002025285,0.0002603773,0.00001864229,0.0005393005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001217585,0.00009539944,0.00007882078,0.0001315742,0.00003964225,0.0001890668,0.0003187712,0.0001078507,0.000008226653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003283192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009128695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001182158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005703957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984639,0.0003284787,0.0006485768,0.0001585605,0.0002273476,0.000173191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989102,0.0001466703,0.0007256595,0.0001431405,0.00001780055,0.00005646727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006844011,0.0002188829,0.02631942,0.03165361,0.0006659406,0.00002126431,0.0004779765,0.001421057,0.000008914779,0.002013807,0.9328246,0.004306097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01981333,0.006913279,0.1711095,0.04351358,0.03048263,0.003163399,0.01652276,0.02898851,0.000013104,0.2257074,0.4499259,0.003846572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02559111,0.003915271,0.4342859,0.5242409,0.003047603,0.007566427,0.00007588087,0.00005941962,0.001217459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005536795,0.0004126073,0.7311588,0.2605548,0.00008334339,0.0008545078,0.00001683078,0.00002415244,0.001358219],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4828987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5904962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03302529194300478,"score_gpt":0.3020386869176506,"score_spread":0.2690133949746458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}