{"id":"W4220683635","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105160","title":"Rethinking chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity assessment for agrochemicals project (ReCAAP): A reporting framework to support a weight of evidence safety assessment without long-term rodent bioassays","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Waiver; Agrochemical; Chronic toxicity; Workgroup; Bioassay; Hazard analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Toxicology; Business; Toxicity; Medicine; Biology; Computer science; Engineering; Agriculture; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5542956,0.005576918,0.005043906,0.02322108,0.007083398,0.02893454,0.02676037,0.02418791,0.002586131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3497294,0.004665384,0.01183811,0.009965248,0.01056509,0.01872483,0.02244721,0.02934192,0.003349651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01815386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1217287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03203569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02281259,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5873902,0.1692636,0.08419357,0.01389328,0.1367947,0.008464615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4081805,0.2026325,0.08750251,0.05054608,0.2360066,0.01513179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007615376,0.002708342,0.00895187,0.01350128,0.001886446,0.003196179,0.007069862,0.02523092,0.0142532,0.3728854,0.2176367,0.3319183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001062838,0.00276749,0.006255481,0.02427436,0.002364806,0.001250787,0.002051229,0.01812194,0.01291397,0.0977446,0.8300352,0.001157256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008504895,0.01355645,0.6944156,0.1364875,0.004972954,0.05692327,0.00760776,0.005093186,0.07243843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02385711,0.005119625,0.9239897,0.01950247,0.001325561,0.01681691,0.003550518,0.0003744321,0.005463629],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4457044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5496329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2555964381386532,"score_gpt":0.4930575664777968,"score_spread":0.2374611283391436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}