{"id":"W4220757114","doi":"10.1002/sim.9367","title":"A mixture distribution approach for assessing genetic impact from twin study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Restricted maximum likelihood; Estimator; Bivariate analysis; Consistency (knowledge bases); Inference; Dizygotic twins; Twin study; Econometrics; Correlation; Monozygotic twin; Genetic correlation; Mathematics; Maximum likelihood; Computer science; Heritability; Biology; Genetics; Genetic variation; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03988807,0.001532422,0.002777915,0.006155363,0.001245033,0.002566742,0.003640597,0.002679757,0.004699947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0977244,0.001520128,0.003355008,0.004685537,0.002301508,0.003336141,0.003854411,0.003618541,0.0007527561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001283827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002172906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006836809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005167459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9774444,0.0174169,0.0007288337,0.002329105,0.001768577,0.000312341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9524008,0.0398801,0.001827703,0.003691807,0.001680411,0.0005191968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001055825,0.0002554065,0.06710983,0.000766785,0.003717097,0.001406091,0.001649792,0.1508033,0.003530101,0.3977356,0.005505348,0.3664649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001222062,0.0001934241,0.01078847,0.0002194093,0.0007127061,0.0008356858,0.0001928818,0.5788713,0.001070907,0.3996365,0.007227345,0.0001291307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.006330075,0.000474917,0.9920024,0.0001533395,0.00003983575,0.0001354579,0.0001652698,0.0001659356,0.0005327576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1765784,0.0009985836,0.8176766,0.0002571541,0.0001535928,0.001191783,0.0009450085,0.000216389,0.001982489],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03988807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2109508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03032945608965508,"score_gpt":0.3634635841395037,"score_spread":0.3331341280498487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}