{"id":"W4220757114","doi":"10.1002/sim.9367","title":"A mixture distribution approach for assessing genetic impact from twin study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Restricted maximum likelihood; Estimator; Bivariate analysis; Consistency (knowledge bases); Inference; Dizygotic twins; Twin study; Econometrics; Correlation; Monozygotic twin; Genetic correlation; Mathematics; Maximum likelihood; Computer science; Heritability; Biology; Genetics; Genetic variation; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001175625,0.0001562927,0.0003192102,0.00008627432,0.0001983003,0.00005080325,0.0005292465,0.00003276969,0.0000402066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002771922,0.000126471,0.00002914893,0.0004164773,0.00004439497,0.00007646305,0.0001885938,0.0003126941,2.87506e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001812653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001032694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003036478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001027407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981066,0.00041566,0.0003346236,0.0004467289,0.0004206757,0.0002757305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988337,0.0004723041,0.0001218141,0.0004253829,0.00006135173,0.00008543855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001215749,0.001745048,0.01247539,0.0000937853,0.0001725885,0.0003268859,0.01503988,0.003485244,0.0006736428,0.1103088,0.04834224,0.8072149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002518101,0.0009926836,0.04220884,0.00001920345,0.00006469938,0.00001754393,0.0007752505,0.6925346,0.00001510431,0.260007,0.0005678603,0.0002791818],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005371678,0.0002791896,0.9924501,0.0001703374,0.0003750888,0.0006382741,0.0005763793,0.00003284094,0.0001060993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3926799,0.000001622018,0.606663,0.0001096602,0.0001149678,0.0001039679,0.0002967564,0.000008576048,0.00002155044],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8069357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5157336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03032945608965508,"score_gpt":0.3634635841395037,"score_spread":0.3331341280498487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}