{"id":"W4220896240","doi":"10.3389/fenvs.2022.758857","title":"Methodological Comparison of the Production Approach 2013 and 2019 for Quantifying the Carbon Stock in Harvested Wood Products in China","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Environmental Science","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China-China Academy of General Technology Joint Fund for Basic Research; Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences; National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China; “333 Project” of Jiangsu Province; Government of Jiangsu Province; Chinese Academy of Sciences","keywords":"Paperboard; Carbon stock; Greenhouse gas; Stock (firearms); Environmental science; Paper production; China; Carbon accounting; Climate change; Waste management; Engineering; Ecology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003796479,0.0001743274,0.0002806831,0.0000967732,0.0003588927,0.00001949174,0.0007122782,0.00004545713,0.00002413238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002812301,0.0001182801,0.00004004734,0.000932903,0.002256128,0.0003301605,0.0010337,0.0004209432,3.301921e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001416296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002127497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009497104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001650382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972056,0.0005726504,0.000396099,0.0007137996,0.0006325055,0.0004794064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992673,0.00006450177,0.0001720424,0.0004437629,9.627101e-7,0.00005142645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006781711,0.0005014591,0.9372991,0.00001296577,0.000001491942,3.78839e-7,0.003413512,0.03338362,0.02222223,0.000008390618,0.0001453176,0.00294375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003125121,0.0001199347,0.9662998,0.000005903174,0.000005215407,0.000005031588,0.007300823,0.02136525,0.003967046,0.0002697975,0.0002002989,0.0001483414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962708,0.0003290267,0.000146121,0.0008751181,0.0003283581,0.001902906,0.000008681882,0.000005290809,0.0001337093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934883,0.00002890586,0.006066613,0.00003207743,0.00000854301,0.00020107,0.000003377047,0.000009439398,0.0001617404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02900078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8312796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06405241705569394,"score_gpt":0.3021916627803673,"score_spread":0.2381392457246734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}