{"id":"W4224236438","doi":"10.1177/01914537221079677","title":"Comedy as dissonant rhetoric","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Comedy; Consonance and dissonance; Rhetoric; Sociology; Scholarship; Deliberation; Aesthetics; Democracy; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Transformative learning; Normative; Politics; Literature; Law; Art; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009550789,0.0005807201,0.0004786904,0.002687082,0.009557395,0.01192051,0.001475766,0.004322658,0.005159354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02068246,0.0003150309,0.0003571478,0.001093005,0.05911982,0.01026551,0.0095272,0.005184034,0.0006808437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004461385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001786336,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007635498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009122903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9855225,0.01047768,0.00019756,0.00098271,0.001941431,0.0008780975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984699,0.01176171,0.000790544,0.001128487,0.001056335,0.0005639645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001862501,0.000009160808,0.0001816758,0.0000591822,0.000003183937,0.0001401722,0.04890715,0.00005374457,0.000312108,0.9443484,0.001458491,0.004508156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003278057,0.00007657424,0.0006695797,0.0004348505,0.00001452116,0.0006434558,0.05011038,0.0006226793,0.001837139,0.6990462,0.2464751,0.00003669275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08386985,0.00406845,0.03230096,0.02475494,0.001198466,0.00006145531,0.00002636614,0.000127431,0.8535921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984813,0.000336987,0.001693011,0.001885188,0.0002735372,0.00004389327,0.0000104348,0.00006609369,0.01087782],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01192051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05051005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0504122145781413,"score_gpt":0.3685987087480033,"score_spread":0.318186494169862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}