{"id":"W4224236438","doi":"10.1177/01914537221079677","title":"Comedy as dissonant rhetoric","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Comedy; Consonance and dissonance; Rhetoric; Sociology; Scholarship; Deliberation; Aesthetics; Democracy; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Transformative learning; Normative; Politics; Literature; Law; Art; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001412789,0.0001426621,0.0002221861,0.00005045546,0.001809382,0.00001742842,0.0002954111,0.0000392716,0.00574185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001585309,0.0001579737,0.0001587403,0.0003022401,0.0001441378,0.00001742844,0.0002161574,0.0003259258,0.0008791363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001038002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002141685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002876362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986486,0.0001167862,0.0002293159,0.0003233879,0.0002995933,0.0003823431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995016,0.00009749675,0.00005477809,0.0002313616,0.00003424451,0.00008049501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001639224,0.0003453442,0.00008057312,0.000006391277,0.00005387868,0.00003020745,0.008377512,2.148145e-7,0.00005201532,0.9689801,0.02068008,0.001377255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004563701,0.0001297789,0.004291264,0.000001639768,0.00004572483,0.00001641141,0.004642856,0.000001687083,0.000004452277,0.3679494,0.6222248,0.0002356812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06728532,0.0009492814,0.00003767733,0.07340588,0.001971706,0.0004310606,0.0002885871,0.0002215112,0.855409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907934,0.000006494473,0.00001902673,0.003108571,0.001452872,0.0009533577,0.00002860481,0.00003438246,0.003603281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9235081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0504122145781413,"score_gpt":0.3685987087480033,"score_spread":0.318186494169862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}