{"id":"W4224274019","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12779","title":"<i>Contemporary Accounting Research</i>: A Retrospective between 1984 and 2021 using Bibliometric Analysis*","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting research; Accounting; Audit; Subject (documents); Bibliometrics; Scope (computer science); Bibliographic coupling; Quality (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Citation; Library science; Regional science; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008846305,0.000245369,0.0005890423,0.05491128,0.001113141,0.005025931,0.0005873794,0.0005623788,0.002442648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03308469,0.0002049189,0.0005374548,0.09283135,0.00119098,0.003541968,0.001858079,0.0006308438,0.001226824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005282614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005309762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03592053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03813296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993399,0.0009152269,0.001258931,0.0005593273,0.003427154,0.000440296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9150066,0.02149048,0.0309254,0.003131544,0.02796589,0.001480093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001513012,0.00008456979,0.8317392,0.002157577,0.000213454,0.0004326199,0.003197802,0.0007725261,0.0006017621,0.00439992,0.01547789,0.1407714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003045147,0.00005433827,0.949358,0.0005531702,0.0001055309,0.0002766004,0.001979824,0.0003813186,0.0005933786,0.0003521152,0.04631942,0.00002326421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8077004,0.1041075,0.001688696,0.007212846,0.0005068232,0.0001657083,0.04738319,0.0002598362,0.030975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433354,0.03032343,0.001313512,0.0005473631,0.0008185226,0.0001214348,0.01979708,0.00004351519,0.00369973],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9450887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07142287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09424337518649772,"score_gpt":0.3461107988387058,"score_spread":0.251867423652208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}