{"id":"W4224280172","doi":"10.3390/jrfm15040172","title":"Best-Arm Identification Using Extreme Value Theory Estimates of the CVaR","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"CVAR; Estimator; Identification (biology); Expected shortfall; Extreme value theory; Selection (genetic algorithm); Value at risk; Econometrics; Computer science; Risk management; Sample (material); Value (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Finance; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01062134,0.001700098,0.003067694,0.002075433,0.0007208188,0.003081125,0.002191697,0.002490483,0.003553117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04362693,0.0007937896,0.001440081,0.001629275,0.00194542,0.003190051,0.00261056,0.003049912,0.0007972434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000812319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001767241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001108339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009302013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956043,0.002927576,0.0001750529,0.0004705012,0.0005722257,0.0002504634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736597,0.02195284,0.001822139,0.001099559,0.001105877,0.0003597725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001496123,0.0001114401,0.002174726,0.000151812,0.0002062016,0.0001546013,0.00007975715,0.8724762,0.0006715777,0.07825361,0.00129596,0.04427443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000151227,0.00004402889,0.0001978608,0.00003444887,0.00001698112,0.00003117986,0.00001280531,0.9485098,0.0002787692,0.05057488,0.0002689086,0.00001514722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009897371,0.0002868677,0.9880406,0.0002620098,0.0000236788,0.00004346741,0.00004515084,0.0002012255,0.001199561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6667424,0.0007749027,0.3277404,0.0003750907,0.0001750194,0.000455144,0.00035356,0.0001786685,0.003204873],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01062134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05617166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07843315199574445,"score_gpt":0.3692801890360355,"score_spread":0.290847037040291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}