{"id":"W4224316114","doi":"10.55529/jeimp.22.12.30","title":"The Curious Case of Article IX and Outer Space Environment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Impact and Management Policy","topic":"Space exploration and regulation","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Outer space; Treaty; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Environmental law; Space (punctuation); Law; International law; Meaning (existential); Jurisprudence; Political science; Space law; Term (time); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Geography; Epistemology; Philosophy; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001550091,0.00007485424,0.00008931205,0.00006655597,0.0002168842,0.00002933349,0.00004695895,0.000006496597,0.0001670572],"category_scores_gemma":[6.52166e-7,0.00005083474,0.00005870454,0.00003554137,0.00007584885,0.0001280174,0.0001402296,0.00007040249,0.000001555348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005631481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005153348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003777233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.142596e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999472,0.00004111678,0.0001828731,0.00005942086,0.0001367279,0.0001078536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996157,0.00001717448,0.0002096677,0.0000859458,0.000001435763,0.00007009401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000651333,0.002101343,0.1433552,0.00005696619,0.002294623,0.000539173,0.01411199,0.01289402,0.02609402,0.07510804,0.007473794,0.7153195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009681359,0.002740065,0.7090806,0.0000358872,0.0006481317,0.002009315,0.05841327,0.003669883,0.003326905,0.02241844,0.1871463,0.0008298323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970557,0.0002927122,0.0003181397,0.001565286,0.00003979157,0.0001241861,0.00001524748,0.000001244486,0.0005877005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987391,0.000328207,0.00009290469,0.00004637193,0.00009100934,0.000003922382,0.000001558058,0.000006520675,0.0006903928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7144896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.207298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005632599031963463,"score_gpt":0.2476684838358754,"score_spread":0.2420358848039119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}