{"id":"W4224992843","doi":"10.5430/wjel.v12n5p27","title":"Examining Rhetorical Strategies in Humorous Discourses: A Systematic Review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"World Journal of English Language","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Metonymy; Rhetorical device; Irony; Metaphor; Linguistics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Psychology; Systematic review; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; MEDLINE; Philosophy; Political science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01282158,0.001707258,0.005225779,0.01559028,0.001059668,0.003661506,0.001775084,0.002317878,0.004545399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06868194,0.001092441,0.004902279,0.01123096,0.001550327,0.004526788,0.001877042,0.001529389,0.0005629607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00294068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01442005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003426756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01240152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876751,0.005783464,0.003409671,0.0006917482,0.002166051,0.0002739747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9347528,0.05306976,0.00641338,0.0008344853,0.00452244,0.0004070744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000845914,0.00003638314,0.0005609128,0.8810816,0.002118965,0.0001047568,0.0009978374,0.00006805036,0.0001861232,0.0007014863,0.001870022,0.1121894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007604258,0.0001630278,0.002653186,0.9396914,0.01385366,0.0004603798,0.001574072,0.00006224618,0.0002794095,0.00074667,0.04039126,0.00004866019],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000854602,0.9978194,0.000271547,0.0002470208,0.0001228568,0.0002442505,0.0000882389,0.000007332685,0.0003448039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01182587,0.9853199,0.001458123,0.0004555933,0.00009918731,0.0006008375,0.0001116844,0.000006600727,0.0001222052],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01559028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06780773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05838258794460166,"score_gpt":0.3647091754071238,"score_spread":0.3063265874625222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}