{"id":"W4225736902","doi":"10.1177/16094069221090063","title":"An Alternative Method of Interviewing: Critical Reflections on Videoconference Interviews for Qualitative Data Collection","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Qualitative research; Videoconferencing; Data collection; Face-to-face; Qualitative property; Space (punctuation); Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Multimedia; Political science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.108964,0.0002823421,0.0008616712,0.0009568691,0.0007382804,0.0001216566,0.002645181,0.00008941417,0.0006496364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03282507,0.0002642063,0.0004346915,0.0007970991,0.000766742,0.001123144,0.000366063,0.0007927605,0.000001750264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007465992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006848638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001074236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001841403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9072176,0.08840908,0.001848209,0.0005638052,0.001607099,0.0003541633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538376,0.03918944,0.00202111,0.0004644954,0.004254364,0.0002329924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009114445,0.0005651531,0.000002855863,0.0000227428,0.0004336743,0.000004191771,0.5502086,0.0001165689,0.002765143,0.3780621,0.0009360393,0.06597146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009299477,0.00308385,0.00001524008,0.0001257367,0.0001014916,0.00001927032,0.6116365,0.001949714,0.003034172,0.299067,0.07977014,0.0002669129],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001228155,0.0003124786,0.9816712,0.007920098,0.004230585,0.0004744562,0.0006416948,0.00002204792,0.003499287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09385561,0.00007511062,0.9042332,0.0006760688,0.0005885409,0.0001344566,0.00005297681,0.00003621126,0.0003478782],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09262746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8823424053717918,"score_gpt":0.7646091000864593,"score_spread":0.1177333052853324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}