{"id":"W4226490301","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.109525.2","title":"Using social annotation to construct knowledge with others: A case study across undergraduate courses","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Construct (python library); Elaboration; Interpretation (philosophy); Annotation; Psychology; Reading (process); Discipline; Coding (social sciences); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Humanities; Sociology; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008197058,0.0004159664,0.0005862256,0.0005858367,0.001713355,0.0003014592,0.0006213539,0.0002296573,0.001169349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003092155,0.0003977831,0.0001023492,0.001208672,0.0004068394,0.00005333026,0.001296756,0.003841519,0.00009652492],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005734928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007117047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008898619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006157585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868668,0.009833871,0.0004574789,0.001125367,0.0007872832,0.0009292436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975089,0.000744125,0.0002595969,0.000735322,0.0006101127,0.0001419369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001767026,0.002594914,0.1214564,0.000273092,0.00195081,0.01228905,0.7575044,0.003195924,0.0003657282,0.003294336,0.007061836,0.08824641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005226784,0.003283637,0.05926222,0.0002230311,0.0002414633,0.002875517,0.9024544,0.001381119,0.00003607336,0.001367798,0.02171951,0.001928437],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742873,0.0001055905,0.01119599,0.0004555765,0.001078446,0.001984638,0.0001681095,0.0002308073,0.01049351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862997,5.466403e-7,0.005995657,0.0000676019,0.0005421175,0.0004892264,0.00004506256,0.0001637321,0.006396363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.14495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3516034491117438,"score_gpt":0.6035375320980129,"score_spread":0.251934082986269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}