{"id":"W4229040532","doi":"10.5539/gjhs.v14n5p10","title":"Creative Self-Efficacy as a Predictor of the Use of Creative Cognition","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Health Science","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Education University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Self-efficacy; Social cognitive theory; Promotion (chess); Perspective (graphical); Scale (ratio); Social cognition; Creative thinking; Empirical research; Variance (accounting); Social psychology; Creativity; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001476013,0.0002070864,0.0001700776,0.0009029722,0.0002382349,0.0006749369,0.00019645,0.0002863647,0.002434438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005445046,0.0001290753,0.0003380679,0.0003884038,0.0004515477,0.0001957357,0.000391778,0.000693417,0.0002346557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001923982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003994905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002275887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003402105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996604,0.0001026299,0.00004520981,0.00003360522,0.00008699547,0.000071278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930816,0.002486699,0.002122553,0.0004119297,0.0005629334,0.001334344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002634855,0.0001566276,0.9973018,0.000006601294,0.00002225735,0.00004067031,0.0001778725,0.00006200004,0.0001620526,0.00004755621,0.00002230992,0.001973843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002759086,0.00007084993,0.999272,0.000005268563,0.000007879493,0.00004700501,0.0002317227,0.0001980182,0.00006287506,0.0000360259,0.0000631571,0.000002473283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993975,0.00004010459,0.00003824144,0.00002053811,0.00000239477,0.000004616792,0.00001773683,0.0000011329,0.0004777803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997135,0.00002468574,0.00004756336,0.000003850709,0.00000235937,0.000003019238,0.00003141204,4.06725e-7,0.0001731699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002434438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008143961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08515904398588173,"score_gpt":0.4206177122888661,"score_spread":0.3354586683029843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}