{"id":"W4229546060","doi":"10.4095/213880","title":"Residual magnetic field contours and em anomalies with Keating coefficients, 42A/12NE, Ontario","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Residual; Geodesy; Geology; Field (mathematics); Geometry; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002633119,0.0002500358,0.0002005262,0.0008402767,0.00132526,0.0007342349,0.0005853335,0.0001733039,0.0114113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001363478,0.000179543,0.000152068,0.00214545,0.0003708185,0.0003217775,0.0003122048,0.0002465067,0.002728753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004685401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008333504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9772615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997324,0.00001027726,0.00001241885,0.00004677284,0.0001490532,0.00004897896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991261,0.00004343398,0.00005170338,0.00006885023,0.0006536435,0.00005630271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001121127,0.0001306516,0.5718544,0.000352691,0.00008813221,0.0005756195,0.003568337,0.01225657,0.01261002,0.005777063,0.2311832,0.1604823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005784256,0.00002950699,0.9108995,0.00002136276,0.0000371961,0.00008270572,0.001281641,0.003202446,0.004617063,0.0002946392,0.07945079,0.00002539298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6042241,0.0003969491,0.005666979,0.000532665,0.00007569711,0.0001744441,0.22245,0.001035682,0.1654434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7560105,0.0003752843,0.005599532,0.00003529491,0.00001980524,0.00005859035,0.06517615,0.0003868159,0.172338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02273846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04574466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02361317208115794,"score_gpt":0.2321000001751204,"score_spread":0.2084868280939624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}