{"id":"W4229694267","doi":"10.1680/gasi.31708.0009","title":"Laboratory investigation of efficiency of conical-based pounders for dynamic compaction","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Dynamic compaction; Impact crater; Compaction; Conical surface; Geotechnical engineering; Penetration (warfare); Relative density; Materials science; Penetration test; Volume (thermodynamics); Composite material; Geology; Engineering; Physics; Subgrade; Microstructure","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000143175,0.0001691785,0.000368317,0.0001347218,0.00001121766,0.000005519163,0.00008098311,0.0002396512,0.0001636654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008774138,0.0001689143,0.0000994006,0.00002277703,0.00009916987,0.00003735374,0.000006249645,0.00006671574,0.000002231574],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001277915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001236973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001341274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008199919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992664,0.000004928559,0.000405476,0.0001147009,0.0001130142,0.0000954088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994724,0.00004346736,0.0001600236,0.0001830588,0.000105033,0.00003603521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004988856,0.00003015299,0.000002965028,0.004489711,0.0002167336,0.000001022939,0.00005513543,0.02327938,0.5316657,0.4390097,0.0007913964,0.0004082159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001758768,0.0005392638,0.00007219947,0.001518116,0.0003385507,0.000001436223,0.00001491387,0.02366427,0.8477355,0.1126314,0.01073835,0.0009872036],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02293326,0.0006508509,0.783138,0.0001103639,0.001349375,0.00259588,0.0008466724,0.001496256,0.1868793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892548,0.00006077281,0.008178859,0.00003882514,0.00001642565,0.00001857746,0.0001626362,0.00007247779,0.002196619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9663215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6888127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01575108573101227,"score_gpt":0.2305871470740433,"score_spread":0.2148360613430311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}