{"id":"W4229737382","doi":"10.1111/1539-6924.00263","title":"Assessing Human Health Response in Life Cycle Assessment Using ED<sub>10</sub>s and DALYs: Part 2—Noncancer Effects","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Extrapolation; Risk assessment; Econometrics; Benchmark (surveying); Risk analysis (engineering); No-observed-adverse-effect level; Point estimation; Computer science; Human health; Environmental health; Toxicology; Medicine; Statistics; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001840143,0.0002412188,0.0005040059,0.0001958658,0.000492973,0.0001475596,0.0001438337,0.00008539842,0.00161197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001509107,0.0002322486,0.0001701245,0.00103504,0.0002474379,0.0005758047,0.0002057015,0.0002536816,0.00003632384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001738546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002514526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002583853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009080938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968653,0.001098002,0.0004677867,0.0005841199,0.000443304,0.0005414595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987143,0.0002023433,0.0002618366,0.0004682043,0.000004603159,0.0003487123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032035,0.0002912667,0.9534669,0.00002304419,0.0001424309,0.00001784937,0.0006214592,0.03131747,0.004826588,0.000001762539,0.0001697902,0.009089402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004147915,0.00009273511,0.8815808,0.00001585722,0.000287095,9.48344e-7,0.0004072083,0.1164701,0.0003228349,0.00005366831,0.000125325,0.0002286916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979514,0.0004449438,0.0007184907,0.0001811459,0.0000218459,0.000242341,0.000006686554,0.00002648181,0.0004065909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986457,0.0003452265,0.0006496168,0.0002141855,0.00002632023,0.00001750671,0.000007273009,0.00001874032,0.00007540037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0851526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.016837969202935,"score_gpt":0.3245971453369735,"score_spread":0.3077591761340385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}