{"id":"W4230169210","doi":"10.1109/iccad.2003.159685","title":"Efficient generation of monitor circuits for GSTE assertion graphs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICCAD-2003. International Conference on Computer Aided Design (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37486)","topic":"Formal Methods in Verification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Assertion; Formal verification; Scalability; Overhead (engineering); Automaton; Programming language; Abstraction; Theoretical computer science; Symbolic trajectory evaluation; Electronic circuit; Model checking; Computer engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005099688,0.0004085666,0.0002848151,0.0003669614,0.0002369294,0.0004924794,0.0005159112,0.0003607066,0.003641842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003781597,0.0002407386,0.0003859386,0.0002642298,0.0005242989,0.0008004706,0.0006322619,0.0005457795,0.0004964785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003477806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005488304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005748281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001015599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993877,0.0001798422,0.00003148749,0.0001167502,0.0002262615,0.00005791049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974692,0.001693476,0.0002034299,0.0003916337,0.000211688,0.00003066921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007881862,0.0002088983,0.006065292,0.0005639909,0.0000568831,0.001359495,0.0005499942,0.1654838,0.3119968,0.1007842,0.005124235,0.4070183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112153,0.0002298349,0.001270533,0.00003067899,0.00004207201,0.0003389447,0.00007295357,0.6678694,0.2849454,0.03455156,0.01050916,0.00002735801],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.08590234,0.00005742172,0.9016578,0.0001407368,0.00003462555,0.0001908492,0.0002645215,0.008711477,0.003040271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7180519,0.0000676058,0.2776693,0.00008479312,0.00001122388,0.000264593,0.0006794277,0.0007453228,0.002425854],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003641842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01218319,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1474870650686887,"score_gpt":0.3351520262246679,"score_spread":0.1876649611559792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}