{"id":"W4230239102","doi":"10.4095/226041","title":"Residual total magnetic field, Partridge Breast Lake aeromagnetic survey, Wood Lake, NTS 64 H/5, Manitoba","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Residual; Hydrology (agriculture); Aeromagnetic survey; Field survey; Archaeology; Physical geography; Geochemistry; Geography; Seismology; Magnetic field; Geotechnical engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006279066,0.0006384,0.0003128132,0.002809007,0.001744079,0.0005550089,0.00169546,0.0002859923,0.01634602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001276507,0.0005267255,0.0002042865,0.003490252,0.0002638826,0.0005107333,0.0005895172,0.0004703931,0.007529878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003774253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01124953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9266815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9703176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996314,0.00003600169,0.00002190619,0.00006911509,0.0001774883,0.00006404507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981861,0.00008663792,0.0001130082,0.0001143047,0.001305396,0.0001945733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005016315,0.0004240457,0.5712373,0.0003400498,0.0001275088,0.0005100493,0.001757521,0.002000985,0.006925636,0.001149976,0.3104773,0.1045479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009496915,0.000099512,0.9082838,0.00007230379,0.00006225705,0.00009230235,0.001293754,0.001024695,0.002715179,0.0001257545,0.08611363,0.00002168857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.281493,0.0005757415,0.002683164,0.0007939476,0.0001376274,0.0008651159,0.60293,0.0009571413,0.1095643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3144445,0.0009852038,0.01080313,0.0003194967,0.00007505251,0.0007843867,0.3590299,0.0004121851,0.313146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07331854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1475006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03521374747571022,"score_gpt":0.2507992684206727,"score_spread":0.2155855209449625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}