{"id":"W4230761888","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.157","title":"Subsets of Women with Close or Positive Margins after Breast Conserving Surgery with High Local Recurrence Risk Despite Breast Plus Boost Radiotherapy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics","topic":"Breast Cancer Treatment Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; BC Cancer Agency","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Breast cancer; Breast-conserving surgery; Radiation therapy; Margin (machine learning); Proportional hazards model; Surgery; Cancer; Mastectomy; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002521401,0.0001892789,0.0004015398,0.0005050756,0.0004744536,0.0006126314,0.0002895719,0.0003585701,0.002549799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001200264,0.0001295593,0.0003253936,0.00043823,0.000282925,0.0005459907,0.000372543,0.0003062717,0.0002676759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001545072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001981489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001153686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001679859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997867,0.00004959649,0.0000190612,0.00004624489,0.00002206373,0.00007632445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995219,0.0001550026,0.0001466222,0.00004573255,0.00002699479,0.0001036667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001743248,0.0000973233,0.9920141,0.00001292828,0.00004575948,0.0003986368,0.0001946439,0.00004663304,0.002195888,0.00007945948,0.00010517,0.003066208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000215735,0.0003917501,0.9968335,0.000004155219,0.00004741033,0.001052758,0.0008209868,0.0001108236,0.0002067757,0.0002015493,0.0003033331,0.000005308204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991794,0.0001397202,0.00003042724,0.00004225025,0.000004044905,0.000006176367,0.00008791578,0.000001203008,0.0005086948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995763,0.00004251286,0.00002143031,0.00002832969,0.00001241151,0.000007669583,0.0001348131,0.000001331178,0.0001753093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002549799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008529902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005800493079547649,"score_gpt":0.262847354072181,"score_spread":0.2570468609926333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}