{"id":"W4230823261","doi":"10.26434/chemrxiv.8184395.v1","title":"Interplay of Direct and Indirect Charge Transfer Pathways in Donor-Bridge-Acceptor Systems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ChemRxiv","topic":"Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Charge (physics); Acceptor; Coupling (piping); Transfer (computing); Bridge (graph theory); Chemical physics; Chemistry; Master equation; Physics; Molecular physics; Quantum; Statistical physics; Materials science; Quantum mechanics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003816603,0.0002944121,0.0004803506,0.0002841707,0.0005494808,0.0008195622,0.0005960759,0.0005822714,0.003081695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006337593,0.0002191468,0.0002418926,0.0001981052,0.0007359872,0.0009389875,0.0009864697,0.0005644659,0.0002538922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000344632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002723166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000357179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005198578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998568,0.00003626203,0.000008838741,0.00002966567,0.00003762996,0.00003069546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999777,0.0001165129,0.00002272244,0.00002908545,0.0000164223,0.0000381259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002851917,0.0005631912,0.002685741,0.0004666775,0.0001021128,0.0006632948,0.0006476862,0.07106072,0.58024,0.3291762,0.0005855153,0.01352367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009799364,0.0005793843,0.003009202,0.0000342796,0.00008223076,0.0003697307,0.0003235231,0.7582104,0.1583753,0.0767815,0.002054662,0.00008176181],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.968712,0.0002654403,0.02479599,0.0001122397,0.00002231852,0.00002608605,0.00004325956,0.00006810456,0.005954587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995826,0.0001455097,0.002944449,0.0000258003,0.000004750497,0.00003446237,0.0000290044,0.00001442216,0.0009755432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003081695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01030934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01912975369428208,"score_gpt":0.2545267449165809,"score_spread":0.2353969912222989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}