{"id":"W4230844368","doi":"10.1093/wjaf/17.2.66","title":"Height Growth Models for Western Larch in British Columbia","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Larch; Site index; Weibull distribution; Logistic function; Population; Physical geography; Mathematics; Geography; Statistics; Forestry; Ecology; Demography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009477278,0.0005928944,0.0004109196,0.001037471,0.0006802272,0.001017109,0.001425901,0.0006368664,0.003215581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002231989,0.0003726034,0.0006004177,0.0009712322,0.0004746459,0.0005001294,0.0005207674,0.0006450524,0.0006727525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006073632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003396625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7631915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7053956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996934,0.00006452627,0.00001301848,0.00007911302,0.0000566734,0.00009322983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992053,0.0003118482,0.00009768277,0.00004096278,0.0002927948,0.00005143305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001266521,0.00004034218,0.04919479,0.00004225503,0.00006566004,0.0001824257,0.0001549277,0.9277761,0.001122344,0.003664806,0.002225509,0.01540415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001452723,0.00001438617,0.02142712,0.00001551866,0.00002215577,0.00003744936,0.00008069576,0.9757162,0.0001810606,0.001332087,0.001139495,0.00001924915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9481319,0.0006582848,0.03523362,0.0004622978,0.00002104219,0.00007269196,0.002471741,0.0007080772,0.0122404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898414,0.0001574969,0.002883154,0.00003835435,0.000006750694,0.00004546372,0.001090537,0.00007186669,0.005864976],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2368085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4764063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01206905503552219,"score_gpt":0.1994093948977712,"score_spread":0.187340339862249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}