{"id":"W4231425351","doi":"10.1109/iccad.1995.479878","title":"The formal verification of a pipelined double-precision IEEE floating-point multiplier","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)","topic":"Formal Methods in Verification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Intelligent verification; Formal verification; Double-precision floating-point format; Model checking; Multiplier (economics); Functional verification; High-level verification; IEEE floating point; Automated theorem proving; Floating point; Formal equivalence checking; Runtime verification; Software verification; Algorithm; Programming language; Software","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009477084,0.0003892326,0.0002683823,0.000322925,0.000607987,0.0008229061,0.0007034011,0.0005741976,0.002157549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002985871,0.0003405165,0.0006252478,0.0001556124,0.001618028,0.001199398,0.0006121114,0.0007799687,0.0003026795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009018509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001971619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002352622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002242071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993675,0.0001279352,0.00004389346,0.00008601497,0.0003099111,0.00006482239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990684,0.0005648176,0.00008869683,0.000123734,0.0001324308,0.00002187891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003354342,0.0001801948,0.001797969,0.000651088,0.00006170435,0.001289771,0.000697862,0.3401338,0.1662332,0.4251059,0.002445587,0.06106756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001954367,0.0004463086,0.0006572448,0.0001258474,0.00005749917,0.0005750131,0.00009946001,0.6901528,0.1932472,0.08876228,0.02560646,0.00007445226],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1460882,0.0002239478,0.8407181,0.0005544354,0.0001608656,0.0002432238,0.0003654232,0.002644275,0.009001481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.824311,0.0002485292,0.1699477,0.00009279879,0.00002669179,0.0001652444,0.0001680124,0.0001051995,0.004934816],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002352622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007217705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1468981887571049,"score_gpt":0.3220068759063403,"score_spread":0.1751086871492354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}