{"id":"W4231446028","doi":"10.4257/oeco.2013.1704.07","title":"A MONITORING TECHNIQUE FOR HIGH-ALTITUDE HEADWATER STREAMS: A CASE STUDY IN THE HIGH ANDES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oecologia Australis","topic":"Water Quality Monitoring Technologies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo","keywords":"STREAMS; Effects of high altitude on humans; Altitude (triangle); Geology; Physical geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Hydrology (agriculture); Earth science; Remote sensing; Geography; Biology; Meteorology; Computer science; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009889299,0.00046011,0.0002418103,0.0006013681,0.002126053,0.001062852,0.0006953703,0.001352635,0.0007921488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001775543,0.0002138339,0.0002370001,0.001447869,0.0007752174,0.0007760467,0.0006084293,0.0006541596,0.0001287863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001164645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001723992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04455889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1550263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993842,0.0001940922,0.00003391446,0.0001010298,0.0001913343,0.00009535661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991304,0.0002852711,0.000149464,0.00006871783,0.0002232021,0.0001429217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004061258,0.001564373,0.5692974,0.0006400583,0.00009748212,0.05968347,0.02929099,0.006276865,0.06131861,0.002240199,0.002163029,0.2670214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001425819,0.003481439,0.7916144,0.0003526618,0.0003289145,0.03596631,0.06636511,0.02399206,0.03587788,0.002012312,0.03971504,0.0001513706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892738,0.0002450045,0.004593785,0.0005080404,0.00001505946,0.000172061,0.00007082065,0.00003466139,0.00508676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812325,0.0005113659,0.0148075,0.0000868596,0.00001354721,0.00004885429,0.00003922461,0.00000974456,0.003250408],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04455889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08859903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05197047896090667,"score_gpt":0.3136468589063974,"score_spread":0.2616763799454907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}