{"id":"W4231698547","doi":"10.1520/stp47770s","title":"Envelope Remediation—A Case Study in Support of an Over-Cladding Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Cladding (metalworking); Building envelope; Envelope (radar); Environmental remediation; Materials science; Environmental science; Nuclear engineering; Engineering; Geography; Composite material; Contamination; Aerospace engineering; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001114384,0.0003831661,0.0002457066,0.0004150033,0.002707789,0.001518237,0.001726793,0.002101081,0.002797293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002263278,0.000184209,0.0003137134,0.0004817882,0.001312503,0.0009824422,0.00129492,0.001148559,0.000490881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001138719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009982522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004695227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01719959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990102,0.0004485885,0.00003533503,0.00007138159,0.0002911504,0.0001432885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991165,0.00044472,0.0000888868,0.0001454267,0.0001073486,0.00009724135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003959849,0.002695014,0.02508814,0.001158717,0.00004886485,0.1959601,0.1278113,0.03077027,0.03302134,0.06343427,0.02274181,0.4968742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007224314,0.002212985,0.02129631,0.0006951137,0.00008479194,0.1073571,0.1611972,0.03722088,0.04447167,0.008634219,0.6166263,0.0001311638],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8998046,0.0009634587,0.02027513,0.002170811,0.0001127553,0.0002231504,0.0000391607,0.0001729429,0.076238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435455,0.0007887515,0.01710764,0.0003638484,0.00003032965,0.00004091035,0.00003150923,0.00004630103,0.03804513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004695227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009357929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01481052354001996,"score_gpt":0.2351525100803917,"score_spread":0.2203419865403717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}