{"id":"W4231901145","doi":"10.1080/11287462.2002.10800821","title":"An apology for ethics in defence of sustainability and integrity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Bioethics","topic":"Social Science and Policy Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Sustainability; Political science; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Environmental resource management; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Ecology; Engineering; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01849204,0.0006965409,0.0008467081,0.0009199257,0.009390479,0.01237966,0.002432567,0.02354124,0.007988705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06886686,0.0004375612,0.0008247811,0.00091209,0.03744315,0.01666815,0.00593358,0.03542617,0.003379518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003844638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00672872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002062399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00213784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9775017,0.01196148,0.001125984,0.002017256,0.006145941,0.001247662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.951889,0.033576,0.00278275,0.002870633,0.006742491,0.002139026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001681268,0.00001472594,0.00008718608,0.00006346843,0.000007716133,0.0001059595,0.001707464,0.00007889454,0.0001168938,0.774959,0.2159794,0.006862548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001689751,0.00001434898,0.0001190909,0.0001803891,0.000006945899,0.0001903385,0.0009802465,0.0003073308,0.0001278827,0.5350839,0.4629509,0.00002168215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001039751,0.003603335,0.005607658,0.9318916,0.01926999,0.00001284557,0.00001803213,0.00005347622,0.03850332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1481097,0.00426472,0.01217908,0.6918781,0.04853746,0.0002123694,0.00004108979,0.0004249431,0.09435251],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09779644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3436553760904447,"score_gpt":0.5710451210239378,"score_spread":0.2273897449334931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}