{"id":"W4232811896","doi":"10.1002/qua.22007","title":"On variational estimates for exchange‐correlation interaction obtained within super‐CI approach to MCSCF approximation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Quantum Chemistry","topic":"Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; National Institute for Nanotechnology","funders":"","keywords":"Hermitian matrix; Brillouin zone; Formalism (music); Hartree–Fock method; Quantum mechanics; Atomic orbital; Configuration interaction; Density matrix; Singular value decomposition; Matrix (chemical analysis); Full configuration interaction; Mathematical physics; Computational chemistry; Mathematics; Physics; Chemistry; Quantum; Molecule","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002391598,0.0001814738,0.0002202677,0.00008240493,0.00008714731,0.0000857264,0.0002629015,0.00005931102,0.0001431228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001780603,0.0001614918,0.0001665827,0.00009503942,0.00001953276,0.0002447854,0.00002182623,0.0002264693,0.000008003518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000162821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004921588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005750728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.23814e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986658,0.00001255585,0.0005302286,0.000199593,0.0004294878,0.0001624023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986765,0.0002097168,0.0004409188,0.00008735338,0.0004949975,0.00009051617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005275416,0.004202361,0.00285986,0.0001721518,0.001421784,0.000007639884,0.00353815,0.07852248,0.5035664,0.373067,0.01708821,0.01027853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004045312,0.0005260313,0.00194933,0.0003756809,0.0001577393,0.00005626504,0.001084707,0.2567004,0.4824796,0.2509276,0.001070724,0.0006266118],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3826536,0.00003801539,0.6079479,0.001822689,0.0007697938,0.0002079304,0.0000823928,0.00002700572,0.006450651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903884,0.000001566356,0.007810951,0.000177428,0.001304083,0.00002195141,0.0002053532,0.0000124913,0.00007781171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6077348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6585444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01710139314059536,"score_gpt":0.29784758444841,"score_spread":0.2807461913078146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}