{"id":"W4232973144","doi":"10.1002/etc.5620200326","title":"Probabilistic risk assessment of cotton pyrethroids: I. Distributional analyses of laboratory aquatic toxicity data","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Aquatic toxicology; Risk assessment; Toxicity; Toxicology; Probabilistic logic; Environmental science; Biology; Statistics; Chemistry; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005616901,0.000299172,0.0005035444,0.000026711,0.0002315018,0.000006856803,0.0005592071,0.0003950348,0.01037268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001321353,0.0002982021,0.00007536264,0.0001875728,0.002942701,0.0002326373,0.0009902793,0.0004060053,0.00003004464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002876987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003156217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002488948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002710099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976993,0.0002143939,0.000637376,0.0007396332,0.0003142611,0.0003950959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998251,0.0002953054,0.000503506,0.0007737176,0.000002360109,0.0001740685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000515155,0.0009544659,0.3793316,0.0000279269,0.00008268359,0.00001201054,0.00003211235,0.0004042947,0.618374,0.00001044325,0.0003243767,0.0003945482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001335272,0.0004794512,0.5556489,0.00001920028,0.000298077,0.00008446264,0.0002955445,0.004444693,0.4340812,0.001082918,0.001757511,0.0004727011],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952673,0.000259435,0.0002582628,0.00008659817,0.00006231656,0.0002506986,0.0008044655,0.00001860897,0.002992296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974021,0.000781708,0.0009484442,0.00009818877,0.00003454406,0.00003137597,0.000383757,0.00001726716,0.0003025865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1842929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02232898932869768,"score_gpt":0.2981334564161734,"score_spread":0.2758044670874757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}