{"id":"W4232973144","doi":"10.1002/etc.5620200326","title":"Probabilistic risk assessment of cotton pyrethroids: I. Distributional analyses of laboratory aquatic toxicity data","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Aquatic toxicology; Risk assessment; Toxicity; Toxicology; Probabilistic logic; Environmental science; Biology; Statistics; Chemistry; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006133957,0.0005016926,0.0005287079,0.001697276,0.0002136407,0.00090529,0.000632478,0.0004226531,0.0009868005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017212,0.0002409774,0.0008487299,0.0006126224,0.0004427419,0.0007925723,0.0008784022,0.0006335232,0.0001177947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007614811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003364862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001840849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001084602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975426,0.001354608,0.0001483172,0.0002712616,0.0006017357,0.00008157054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731022,0.02210268,0.00214962,0.0009882028,0.0015327,0.0001245594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005699741,0.0003074105,0.07239348,0.0002465608,0.0003824221,0.00023012,0.0001506058,0.8579592,0.01031047,0.003792172,0.0007846424,0.05287291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002789578,0.0007959256,0.03185731,0.00003043681,0.00006836328,0.0004397128,0.0001357825,0.9528614,0.007541611,0.005030625,0.001136235,0.00007468901],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8367688,0.0006952448,0.1584985,0.0001731701,0.00001056667,0.0002048529,0.0009918625,0.0003193551,0.002337657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849885,0.0001980502,0.01319257,0.00002686636,0.00001071082,0.0001354195,0.001010054,0.00002077177,0.0004170414],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006133957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03243989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02232898932869768,"score_gpt":0.2981334564161734,"score_spread":0.2758044670874757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}