{"id":"W4233044663","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.41","title":"DEFERENCE, DEFIANCE, AND DOCTRINE: DEFINING THE LIMITS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Statute; Standard of review; Doctrine; Legitimacy; Law and economics; Judicial deference; Substantive due process; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Separation of powers; Legislature; Sociology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04086169,0.0003286551,0.001065209,0.004345259,0.004357731,0.01801937,0.00260039,0.007880401,0.002084512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09487025,0.0006710725,0.0005020188,0.001804531,0.0423133,0.01277532,0.006199467,0.006604488,0.0005345685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01141166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01266407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01037699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01069253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9605327,0.01870534,0.002991993,0.003495522,0.01137985,0.002894512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9221348,0.05479332,0.004457757,0.006662581,0.009185878,0.002765763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003878371,0.000003657206,0.0001530454,0.00001285486,0.000001550389,0.00002534757,0.0005322674,0.0001324541,0.00006032954,0.9942821,0.0009775391,0.003814932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001407336,0.00002038241,0.0004224601,0.0002234192,0.000005937562,0.0000892222,0.0004697933,0.0007466919,0.0001450655,0.9565376,0.04129941,0.00002591013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05860707,0.08738241,0.125778,0.07979871,0.001237503,0.0003192688,0.0001765586,0.0001871258,0.6465134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435099,0.008843266,0.02057558,0.007144206,0.00171509,0.0003302866,0.00006506372,0.00008545136,0.01773108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04086169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2160998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01872079232334788,"score_gpt":0.2624389055036149,"score_spread":0.243718113180267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}