{"id":"W4233044663","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.41","title":"DEFERENCE, DEFIANCE, AND DOCTRINE: DEFINING THE LIMITS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Statute; Standard of review; Doctrine; Legitimacy; Law and economics; Judicial deference; Substantive due process; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Separation of powers; Legislature; Sociology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004391979,0.00004480209,0.0001438682,0.000006858697,0.001237353,0.000009329463,0.0002012386,0.00003475386,0.0002962538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009884968,0.00003606804,0.00006198812,0.00004058653,0.001027653,0.0001883683,0.00004425711,0.0001388711,0.000002202662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000281925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001273562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07444991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.479294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994504,0.00005928032,0.0000994486,0.00005812648,0.0002228717,0.0001098833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994655,0.0000892615,0.0001494259,0.00004707207,0.0001892574,0.00005946112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001405114,0.00001328115,0.003395141,0.00001049884,0.00002620708,0.000002783245,0.001163422,2.033409e-7,0.00002855118,0.9865524,0.001012188,0.007781309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004739703,0.00008087798,0.03347731,0.0005958886,0.0002048505,0.00002583553,0.0086556,9.543232e-7,0.00002093556,0.0162518,0.9400543,0.000157709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05079653,0.04011943,0.00004139621,0.002535271,0.0003785087,0.000108079,0.000008869246,0.000008840717,0.9060031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590858,0.04032633,0.0003157629,0.0001088853,0.00009392427,3.766591e-8,2.216599e-7,9.25982e-7,0.000068127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9703006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9516842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01872079232334788,"score_gpt":0.2624389055036149,"score_spread":0.243718113180267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}