{"id":"W4233125715","doi":"10.1520/stp104103t","title":"Evaluation of Fire-resistant Clothing Using an Instrumented Mannequin: A Comparison of Exposure Test Conditions Set With a Cylinder Form or Mannequin Form","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"ASTM International eBooks","topic":"Textile materials and evaluations","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Cylinder; Set (abstract data type); Test (biology); Architectural engineering; Engineering drawing; Engineering; Computer science; Mechanical engineering; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001581579,0.0004058042,0.0006362616,0.0002765052,0.0001793062,0.000106286,0.0004691102,0.0002654538,0.004865604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001306763,0.0003355049,0.0001266823,0.00002965337,0.0002607791,0.0004643198,0.0001576926,0.0001830798,0.00003112437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003981472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006272938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001816038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006756174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958646,0.0000879095,0.001249496,0.0004299088,0.002057284,0.0003107427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960012,0.0001636886,0.001579329,0.0004580309,0.001679227,0.0001185084],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002255278,0.001344184,0.0006549819,0.0007476926,0.001269907,0.00001600521,0.01573296,0.006003323,0.8553959,0.09764615,0.0003880893,0.01854552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02811143,0.01444634,0.01183909,0.01886774,0.01412159,0.0006184464,0.01041122,0.2071223,0.544156,0.1259345,0.01686894,0.007502359],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9373351,0.00009695727,0.0004580592,0.00004525988,0.0009421336,0.001297655,0.003384378,0.00007223196,0.05636827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918534,0.000003023489,0.001731327,0.00003328245,0.0002585441,0.00009087504,0.0006954726,0.00007672582,0.005257331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3112399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1524718488569504,"score_gpt":0.3692375584639125,"score_spread":0.2167657096069622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}