{"id":"W4233470406","doi":"10.1016/j.geomphys.2013.04.002","title":"Constant curvature solutions of Grassmannian sigma models: (2) Non-holomorphic solutions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geometry and Physics","topic":"Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Holomorphic function; Grassmannian; Mathematics; Constant (computer programming); Curvature; Constant curvature; Sigma; Pure mathematics; Mean curvature; Mathematical analysis; Mathematical physics; Geometry; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001030494,0.001863513,0.0014602,0.002584934,0.001812562,0.004673384,0.002098301,0.004225127,0.006931748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003828504,0.0007719219,0.001277965,0.001562953,0.004367932,0.00517034,0.003492819,0.002692388,0.000969353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001294461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001356445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001837295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001637612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995103,0.0000992893,0.00003738146,0.00008898182,0.000131674,0.0001323215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987885,0.0001382908,0.0002495182,0.0001257645,0.0002423738,0.0004554778],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000704213,0.00005429353,0.000601532,0.00006937383,0.00002090058,0.0004866982,0.0003474327,0.004484504,0.002524238,0.9876623,0.001125711,0.002552625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007185928,0.00004497992,0.0005424018,0.00002664291,0.00001605037,0.0004365826,0.0004050441,0.04112376,0.0005052179,0.9558044,0.0009797465,0.00004311854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8184478,0.001692915,0.1183203,0.003566136,0.0007683444,0.0001208673,0.0002727246,0.0003933448,0.05641755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622676,0.0005497681,0.009303816,0.0005593707,0.0004769722,0.00007165723,0.0002563698,0.0001177617,0.02639672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006931748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02318901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05780215814391036,"score_gpt":0.2677132813117499,"score_spread":0.2099111231678396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}