{"id":"W4233470406","doi":"10.1016/j.geomphys.2013.04.002","title":"Constant curvature solutions of Grassmannian sigma models: (2) Non-holomorphic solutions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geometry and Physics","topic":"Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Holomorphic function; Grassmannian; Mathematics; Constant (computer programming); Curvature; Constant curvature; Sigma; Pure mathematics; Mean curvature; Mathematical analysis; Mathematical physics; Geometry; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006452897,0.0002054812,0.00066063,0.0002850058,0.0002145467,0.00006333652,0.000237665,0.0001616951,0.0001136632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000222488,0.0001571947,0.0003522866,0.001522535,0.0001695354,0.0006105008,0.00008741625,0.0005623687,0.000006044329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002919732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009808182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002590291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004298732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998219,0.00007268527,0.0007470368,0.0001493371,0.0004688283,0.0003431174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974457,0.000387308,0.0008550902,0.0002840386,0.0008397071,0.0001881568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001418106,0.004993023,0.0068755,0.001078228,0.005107222,0.00005898683,0.003699404,0.01138348,0.009540516,0.7778057,0.1351858,0.04413028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001309726,0.0005024221,0.003637234,0.0002811253,0.00108242,0.0001409515,0.001523561,0.02785695,0.0002827252,0.961654,0.001256169,0.0004726766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5266138,0.003268033,0.4653293,0.001067656,0.0003790892,0.0002952014,0.0000728283,0.00002054959,0.002953534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992568,0.0002739937,0.00662207,0.00006882387,0.0002667403,0.000003461098,0.000004801166,0.00001727549,0.0001747905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4659542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6410212,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05780215814391036,"score_gpt":0.2677132813117499,"score_spread":0.2099111231678396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}