{"id":"W4233558547","doi":"10.22215/etd/2009-09256","title":"A case study evaluating runoff generation in a subarctic catchment using stable isotope, hydrochemical and hydrometric data","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Subarctic climate; Drainage basin; Hydrology (agriculture); Surface runoff; Environmental science; Geography; Geology; Cartography; Archaeology; Ecology; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001233456,0.00045627,0.000342402,0.001083991,0.0008764163,0.0009757376,0.0005942414,0.0008242136,0.00112403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002251699,0.0002446789,0.000439344,0.002596183,0.0004971848,0.0004621961,0.0004987805,0.0003897865,0.0002021231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002304563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009047471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06729721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1306023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994325,0.000265611,0.00003463511,0.00007096654,0.0001175206,0.00007876613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984159,0.0008793527,0.0001542456,0.0001186503,0.0002717207,0.0001600974],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001429037,0.003434361,0.7392578,0.0003339759,0.0003445387,0.0275406,0.003316769,0.1321584,0.01558468,0.001232989,0.002056556,0.0733104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002360037,0.002109078,0.7681382,0.00006708879,0.0002362974,0.003013237,0.01050654,0.2004693,0.01090566,0.00101106,0.003194609,0.000112922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975967,0.00004419304,0.0009348789,0.00004727598,0.000002548324,0.00006903042,0.0002300277,0.00003224483,0.001043202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952559,0.000100895,0.003528417,0.00001246903,0.000004081918,0.0000227794,0.0002853725,0.000008949787,0.0007810969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06729721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.133811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09065499915482517,"score_gpt":0.3478626790251423,"score_spread":0.2572076798703172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}