{"id":"W4233643685","doi":"10.1017/s0008413100001079","title":"Agreement Paradigms across Moods and Tenses: The Case of Romanian Subjunctives and Imperatives","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Agreement; Present tense; Allomorph; Romanian; Representation (politics); Realization (probability); Past tense; Psychology; Romance languages; Dependent clause; Morpheme; Verb; Philosophy; Mathematics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002027398,0.0002668315,0.0004288023,0.0001676602,0.001087463,0.000406147,0.0003335973,0.0001110725,0.00002813033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01553699,0.0001887343,0.00009264409,0.00007796288,0.0009744274,0.00003142155,0.00002403918,0.0005324063,5.838742e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002495871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007740505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1800876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.917629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981368,0.0002546315,0.0007123334,0.0002088585,0.00008888965,0.0005984499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960948,0.0007819703,0.0006258191,0.000334105,0.001552874,0.0006104664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002475877,0.00001458711,0.000771659,0.00004638964,0.00009207913,0.002209353,0.2370729,0.00006802681,0.00001329225,0.7589504,0.00006325627,0.0006732267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002219244,0.002013421,0.026233,0.001368917,0.001131336,0.01686168,0.1469784,0.005000164,0.0002757433,0.6718728,0.1246603,0.001385057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794813,0.001467841,0.0001347299,0.0097156,0.001737137,0.0003081368,0.0002111693,0.00001000597,0.006934049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948503,0.00006572964,0.0006224444,0.000330883,0.003847614,0.000002940448,0.00000369767,0.00002677436,0.0002496425],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7375414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01694901828650501,"score_gpt":0.2493874114214202,"score_spread":0.2324383931349152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}