{"id":"W4233768245","doi":"10.5383/swes.06.01.0004","title":"An Appraisal of Genus Riccia in India with a Note on Diversity and Distribution of Species","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sustainable Water and Environmental Systems","topic":"Diatoms and Algae Research","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxonomy (biology); Ciliata; Botany; Biology; Genus; Distribution (mathematics); Zoology; Ecology; Protozoa; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002136324,0.0006466262,0.0003909637,0.006137261,0.0007944756,0.001418294,0.0008677064,0.0002379951,0.003334735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004856055,0.0001634077,0.0004015111,0.005584195,0.0008372415,0.0008017069,0.0005341789,0.0005245939,0.0009552594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009783524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001076772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01010895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01191318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997316,0.00003448474,0.00004145564,0.00004605723,0.0001015082,0.00004480039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996736,0.00007489643,0.00007531494,0.00002197089,0.0001295023,0.00002464977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001671689,0.00004806992,0.01516081,0.007400162,0.00007058432,0.001855793,0.004410353,0.0009311396,0.006316756,0.01938442,0.05701103,0.8872437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002826928,0.00006536103,0.07419356,0.001124116,0.00005893984,0.003160987,0.001883628,0.0001939189,0.0005275572,0.001428133,0.9173309,0.00003014852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06279729,0.7969328,0.001836598,0.003540508,0.003504694,0.0001055884,0.001252658,0.0006076065,0.1294223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.477902,0.4806978,0.007200019,0.002394071,0.002904586,0.0000940137,0.00283989,0.0001608142,0.02580672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01010895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02010024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005859804625473538,"score_gpt":0.2258393626456381,"score_spread":0.2199795580201646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}