{"id":"W4233897087","doi":"10.5194/bgd-11-5711-2014","title":"Local spatial structure of forest biomass and its consequences for remote sensing of carbon stocks","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Remote sensing; Spatial variability; Spatial ecology; Biomass (ecology); Spatial analysis; Carbon stock; Sampling (signal processing); Calibration; Scale (ratio); Geography; Statistics; Ecology; Computer science; Mathematics; Cartography; Climate change","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001182868,0.0001681638,0.000315119,0.00003906969,0.0000446572,0.00001115995,0.0001275863,0.0002319956,0.00001667711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004011422,0.0001421759,0.00006294941,0.00005427726,0.0005503001,0.00001209282,0.0002477382,0.0001303331,6.189939e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004079976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003128432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02027425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004853412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989483,0.00003868013,0.0003076965,0.0003678236,0.0001900861,0.0001474431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992199,0.0000938174,0.00028562,0.0003083167,0.00003224457,0.00006011116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008872096,0.000023066,0.00211417,0.0007101082,0.00009407406,0.000001629172,0.0006702884,0.0236326,0.769205,0.0003130482,0.0001673442,0.20298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002819995,0.00009514326,0.005931342,0.0001373975,0.00008525751,0.0000204358,0.00007988088,0.6310013,0.3461968,0.0156065,0.0002684179,0.0002954739],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8071769,0.00002198401,0.1905092,0.0001376935,0.00008884818,0.0004526259,0.00004465544,0.00001640119,0.001551684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773877,0.000005568933,0.02245759,0.00001659606,0.00003299924,1.278365e-7,0.00002281752,0.00001362375,0.00006299822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6073687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862498,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01263465792285167,"score_gpt":0.2441000279919992,"score_spread":0.2314653700691475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}