{"id":"W4233999282","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14647695.v1","title":"Assessment of androgenic response potential of effluents using in vitro and in vivo methods","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mosquitofish; Bioassay; In vivo; Effluent; Aromatase; Biology; Pharmacology; In vitro; Stigmasterol; Androgen receptor; Androstenedione; Chemistry; Gambusia; Androgen; Endocrinology; Biochemistry; Chromatography; Biotechnology; Hormone; Fishery; Ecology; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000666203,0.0002283623,0.0004575369,0.00006729696,0.000009692954,0.00001308354,0.0001949523,0.0005534023,0.00002571578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009983288,0.0002416057,0.0001412864,0.0000912499,0.00008601497,0.000001792545,0.00088353,0.0002431837,1.042559e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003624514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000342096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005109898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005613981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983214,0.0002663014,0.0005416651,0.0005465717,0.0001379317,0.0001861487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991299,0.00002810638,0.000238457,0.0004709153,0.00008040474,0.00005223301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007782198,0.0001442447,0.00392087,0.000454105,0.00007591539,0.00001599903,0.00001503456,0.0004275143,0.9939972,9.081677e-8,0.00000256813,0.0001682806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000832286,0.00003064179,0.006407374,0.0001573375,0.00003494051,0.00002558201,0.0001519738,0.001212399,0.9909292,0.000007124653,0.000008107911,0.0002029777],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965212,0.00141515,0.001673196,0.000009631563,0.00007294967,0.0001293126,0.00005407854,0.00000210044,0.0001224322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700175,0.0001628225,0.02958647,0.00001633045,0.00003027532,0.000009252609,0.00008490661,0.00001485821,0.00007762117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02791327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9852393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01603959764997644,"score_gpt":0.356417442676508,"score_spread":0.3403778450265316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}