{"id":"W4234065122","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.2.103","title":"Business and Society and Business Ethics Journals: A Citation and Impact Analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Ranking (information retrieval); Argument (complex analysis); Business ethics; Citation; Citation analysis; Philosophy of business; Sociology; Business analysis; Business model; Business; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Computer science; Law; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03522678,0.0001863371,0.0005187496,0.001525515,0.0007517857,0.0666363,0.0005274144,0.0004548799,0.00002791907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09859168,0.0001279884,0.0001634917,0.006486841,0.0002417113,0.07292329,0.0001928891,0.002646996,6.950475e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001478588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001181803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004055639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001272742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952587,0.0003073415,0.001150936,0.000342287,0.002691014,0.0002497294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761066,0.003122501,0.001636468,0.0002624672,0.01851002,0.0003619621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001338055,0.0002267857,0.8500265,0.0001612873,0.00120585,0.00003654195,0.05156407,0.009519672,0.002272059,0.00847116,0.002698321,0.0736839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000634624,0.00002984496,0.8759437,0.0001923401,0.0002542358,0.0002687444,0.006508649,0.000198096,0.000007257611,0.1153981,0.0004239117,0.0001404236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8970167,0.005514509,0.04018024,0.05660735,0.0004780395,0.00005152829,0.000005973464,0.000007512077,0.0001381295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818585,0.00434595,0.01239128,0.0009104439,0.00044811,7.71312e-7,0.000002332722,0.00001269496,0.00002995432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.106927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996539,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.273216844505403,"score_gpt":0.446308274333392,"score_spread":0.173091429827989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}