{"id":"W4235160088","doi":"10.26434/chemrxiv.6189617.v2","title":"A Bayesian Approach to Predict Solubility Parameters","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ChemRxiv","topic":"Machine Learning in Materials Science","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz; Solar Technologies go Hybrid; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS); U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Solubility; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Miscibility; Flexibility (engineering); Toolbox; Probabilistic logic; Set (abstract data type); Consistency (knowledge bases); Biological system; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Chemistry; Polymer; Mathematics; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003104814,0.0005937789,0.0007620716,0.0001626195,0.0002480051,0.0006603728,0.002538867,0.0004525568,0.001164513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001258815,0.0005394681,0.0001940588,0.0002764486,0.0006185837,0.0001437655,0.002926661,0.0005829947,0.001383141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000207367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002764035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002671367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005355324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950351,0.000379642,0.0007118919,0.002121155,0.0008345498,0.0009176818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964675,0.0001160112,0.0003963863,0.002349654,0.0001889002,0.0004815758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002878689,0.0008535505,0.00932853,0.002483967,0.00006294894,0.0000195734,0.004365032,0.05238037,0.888368,0.0003302176,0.04078212,0.0007378624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000715513,0.000409053,0.01322492,0.0006764841,0.0001659435,0.00004981575,0.0001325537,0.1115367,0.8504938,0.01400835,0.005337951,0.003248883],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8923275,0.00002975942,0.08758372,0.0003256849,0.003460412,0.001083399,0.00003136016,0.0006593686,0.01449876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7892574,0.000002595289,0.2088896,0.0004051915,0.0005739134,0.0003252122,0.00003856157,0.00006444657,0.0004431395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1213058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02712077660177568,"score_gpt":0.2757814230263786,"score_spread":0.248660646424603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}