{"id":"W4235644751","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/r5c28","title":"The vanity construct re-examined: LeBel's vanity scale","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Conceptualization; Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Discriminant validity; Construct validity; Construct (python library); Convergent validity; Social psychology; Psychometrics; Internal consistency; Clinical psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00165241,0.0002872148,0.0003145999,0.002853168,0.0007713392,0.001533887,0.0005736838,0.0004200856,0.004551302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009821338,0.0001320733,0.0004591378,0.001037626,0.0008664551,0.001341344,0.00199886,0.00115733,0.0005413949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001085018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001077606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002151476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002945564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988452,0.0003111703,0.0001012151,0.00008968416,0.0005095317,0.0001431317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962748,0.0009421817,0.0008493391,0.0002133674,0.001209009,0.0005113126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000333491,0.0004058934,0.64516,0.0004310907,0.0002590096,0.00111607,0.01395375,0.00149821,0.006289164,0.03470748,0.01302117,0.2828247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009304135,0.0006531824,0.8365163,0.0007427421,0.0001419901,0.003204112,0.01942254,0.006612408,0.002612665,0.02502393,0.1048106,0.0001665357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9398596,0.00104073,0.009692483,0.0009268448,0.000198569,0.0004321875,0.0009269385,0.0001052739,0.0468175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878328,0.0002752789,0.005739173,0.0001314932,0.00003084675,0.0002423623,0.0004967878,0.00002521902,0.00522606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004551302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01522559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08668382180176004,"score_gpt":0.3894056748935021,"score_spread":0.302721853091742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}