{"id":"W4235793036","doi":"10.22215/etd/2005-07854","title":"A higher amorality: Niklas Luhmann and his critics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy; Library science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004456993,0.0001198185,0.0001658493,0.00008260734,0.0004792265,0.000236471,0.00009110522,0.0001906509,0.003811973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003017673,0.0001162205,0.00004320627,0.00009949916,0.00005883451,0.0004799359,0.000008635882,0.00008765497,0.0000946826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000994353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001115681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003298247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01414074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988671,0.00008262024,0.0003489908,0.0001246603,0.0003683633,0.0002082825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994244,0.00004558375,0.0001662834,0.00008721781,0.000199288,0.00007722517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009073332,0.000006990118,0.000123715,0.00007444105,0.0000169592,3.025538e-7,0.03351473,8.214274e-8,0.000003310445,0.9289951,0.02296495,0.01429028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001498599,0.00001443114,0.001446891,0.00002807327,0.00002636799,3.226623e-7,0.09425101,0.000002934889,0.00003266812,0.002149892,0.9017231,0.0001744378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03018389,0.0001457652,0.00004049413,0.0009054928,0.001638137,0.0003926801,0.00002452524,0.00009555374,0.9665735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5406124,0.0002571054,0.0003367595,0.0006262059,0.001047324,0.0000456961,0.0007825529,0.00001805472,0.4562739],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9268453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03042702885562681,"score_gpt":0.378227845090633,"score_spread":0.3478008162350062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}