{"id":"W4235835076","doi":"10.1515/ijnsns-2011-120","title":"Establishment of a Dynamic Mohr–Coulomb Failure Criterion for Rocks","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation","topic":"High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Beijing Institute of Technology","keywords":"Ultimate tensile strength; Mohr–Coulomb theory; Split-Hopkinson pressure bar; Compressive strength; Shear (geology); Materials science; Shear strength (soil); Geotechnical engineering; Hoek–Brown failure criterion; Strength theory; Composite material; Structural engineering; Geology; Finite element method; Engineering; Strain rate","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006472282,0.00008271406,0.0001711604,0.0001170879,0.00007421913,0.0001078731,0.0002245874,0.00004534361,0.0001151504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001802762,0.00006056154,0.00006627911,0.00009250536,0.00009482428,0.0008167748,0.00004788503,0.00004585999,0.000002826769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004597326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004796747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000282573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001649531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988199,0.00003174037,0.0004100666,0.00009384553,0.0004768047,0.0001675748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998989,0.0001414671,0.0003670097,0.00004305677,0.0003567723,0.0001027221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004778836,0.0004620441,0.01026916,0.00003158549,0.00002642171,0.000002436733,0.001248522,0.01437263,0.9507831,0.0002231429,0.00008597787,0.02201714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006047768,0.004525992,0.1021887,0.0005091189,0.0002794182,0.0002666962,0.00154268,0.5703599,0.2786263,0.001801378,0.03276112,0.001090889],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9479356,0.00007047039,0.05023959,0.0005194973,0.001090541,0.00008608538,0.00004269726,0.000006039272,0.00000951727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768951,0.00001162221,0.02271705,0.00005054594,0.0003018744,0.000001457623,0.000005282107,0.000004678292,0.00001237005],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6721568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2469628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02526051095485679,"score_gpt":0.3592197104243212,"score_spread":0.3339591994694644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}