{"id":"W4235997260","doi":"10.5194/acpd-10-19005-2010","title":"Evidence for the effectiveness of the Montreal Protocol to protect the ozone layer","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Atmospheric Ozone and Climate","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Environment Agency; British Antarctic Survey; European Commission; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Montreal Protocol; Ozone; Ozone layer; Proxy (statistics); Environmental science; Atmospheric sciences; Linear model; Term (time); Volcano; Climatology; Meteorology; Geography; Mathematics; Statistics; Geology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01299365,0.0003696087,0.0002367619,0.001006217,0.0009721048,0.001812331,0.00201262,0.001334651,0.01040511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05311713,0.0002365392,0.0006776493,0.001294948,0.002291703,0.001229358,0.001129739,0.00197587,0.0005278204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007099312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009338326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4636983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4161599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911138,0.002836965,0.0002999965,0.0008833796,0.003834927,0.001030984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9408036,0.02278042,0.01550314,0.004565126,0.01283821,0.003509431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002059153,0.001041019,0.7688947,0.0007398165,0.001555415,0.0005331885,0.001767071,0.003519689,0.003157644,0.06334089,0.03529741,0.1180939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001255248,0.0006048791,0.9500846,0.0003374337,0.0003756127,0.0001292515,0.0009136861,0.00302704,0.001823298,0.00253671,0.03998883,0.00005320563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8109924,0.01510127,0.007346186,0.03685956,0.00113292,0.0005883151,0.007671597,0.0001870433,0.1201207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891567,0.001481072,0.001113766,0.002006101,0.0001397144,0.00005761945,0.0007883804,0.00002258529,0.005234098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4636983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9219986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0511524400111425,"score_gpt":0.3061821815620164,"score_spread":0.2550297415508739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}