{"id":"W4236048929","doi":"10.1002/smr.376","title":"Introduction to the special issue on program comprehension through dynamic analysis (PCODA)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution Research and Practice","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Program comprehension; Computer science; Reverse engineering; Comprehension; Software engineering; Software; Program analysis; Source code; Data science; Software system; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00404644,0.0001301814,0.0002398107,0.0005431343,0.0006543052,0.0002283339,0.0005000413,0.00006970089,0.0000199133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01474716,0.00008697493,0.00007306277,0.002362984,0.000244685,0.001204015,0.0002587375,0.0009418983,0.00004494865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002095658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001546077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000711367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001799606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969894,0.0005678205,0.0003238815,0.0003540556,0.001293077,0.0004718069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934363,0.004101675,0.0001580339,0.0004253394,0.001659602,0.0002190945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004906732,0.001439804,0.01391328,0.000136738,0.00116461,0.0007144359,0.007072003,0.01228015,0.0003565964,0.005347677,0.6966864,0.2559816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005095996,0.003051772,0.16732,0.00006868823,0.00004739531,0.00150333,0.0005681192,0.00416521,0.00003586227,0.0008823649,0.8216652,0.0001824828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08036835,0.001695669,0.7718237,0.1440105,0.001034123,0.0007206718,0.000004637282,0.0001238898,0.000218499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8176636,0.004132423,0.1690447,0.0005070528,0.007068818,0.00003962801,0.000003225685,0.00002574369,0.001514899],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7372952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03584303218008123,"score_gpt":0.3541619928238779,"score_spread":0.3183189606437967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}