{"id":"W4236087026","doi":"10.2172/941554","title":"Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) Report, Pend Oreille Wetlands Wildlife I Project, Technical Report 2002.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"California Department of Fish and Wildlife; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Goose; Marsh; Wetland; Geography; Ecology; Stork; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01106378,0.00094288,0.0004811117,0.003331374,0.001118515,0.001511829,0.001660847,0.0004346498,0.04624376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01701364,0.0006627414,0.0004345574,0.002895407,0.000386093,0.001520161,0.001412261,0.0008106526,0.02539348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001891632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005344416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0648232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947203,0.001374364,0.0005110611,0.0003876385,0.002765918,0.0002406526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871793,0.001557978,0.0008824468,0.001488401,0.008478138,0.0004136945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002517459,0.0005864269,0.02465178,0.0002586049,0.00002857742,0.0001042137,0.0004710702,0.0007014061,0.00182406,0.002304962,0.6981252,0.270692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001604433,0.0003788977,0.1435196,0.0004079343,0.00004940026,0.0001823241,0.001384819,0.003037108,0.004607075,0.001828532,0.8443677,0.00007617349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05371333,0.001017609,0.1424908,0.002209718,0.000826544,0.03510938,0.4247645,0.006812573,0.3330555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04125212,0.001096715,0.2330747,0.001008436,0.0001113826,0.04048345,0.4925979,0.002038377,0.1883368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04624376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1547008,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03608421942476226,"score_gpt":0.3145381494872202,"score_spread":0.2784539300624579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}