{"id":"W4236092342","doi":"10.1109/ipcc.2014.7020398","title":"Who says what to whom? Assessing the alignment of content and audience between scholarly and professional publications in technical communication (1996–2013)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Technical communication; Publication; Conversation; Professional communication; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Curriculum; Peer review; Target audience; Professionalization; Computer science; Publishing; Sociology; Political science; Business; Pedagogy; World Wide Web; Marketing; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05149694,0.0003107761,0.0004124807,0.009669924,0.003866455,0.009484163,0.0008827389,0.001718194,0.002160853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2040638,0.0004352879,0.0003242472,0.008200439,0.004961814,0.01037354,0.006231268,0.001885959,0.0006915488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006013532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004433528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004746529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004430984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9626077,0.02162604,0.004549695,0.00179831,0.008084657,0.001333748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7481092,0.1691687,0.04716289,0.005051586,0.02647584,0.004031753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000198822,0.00009863166,0.2010033,0.0006122384,0.00004285286,0.0003213961,0.7114398,0.0001290707,0.002801196,0.00822074,0.0020968,0.07303509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000295375,0.0001394016,0.3032103,0.001211207,0.00006644137,0.0003490758,0.6581767,0.001104425,0.003106928,0.004637608,0.02787493,0.00009336073],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718397,0.001335095,0.002494805,0.004646209,0.0001202743,0.0001475676,0.000202392,0.00002235143,0.01919178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934584,0.0009545393,0.002611917,0.0005111133,0.0001246708,0.0004133691,0.0002100627,0.0000347627,0.001681077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2723451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09732953573585182,"score_gpt":0.347525759647923,"score_spread":0.2501962239120712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}