{"id":"W4236129338","doi":"10.1149/ma2016-02/46/3423","title":"Electrochemical Approach to Evaluate the Wettability of Rough Surfaces","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ECS Meeting Abstracts","topic":"Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wetting; Contact angle; Capacitance; Materials science; Surface finish; Surface roughness; Electrochemistry; Wetting transition; Surface (topology); Work (physics); Characterization (materials science); Cyclic voltammetry; Composite material; Nanotechnology; Electrode; Chemistry; Thermodynamics; Geometry; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006160432,0.0006183022,0.0006079841,0.001204093,0.0003139512,0.0004801551,0.0006467039,0.0007513447,0.001593144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001271611,0.0002919362,0.0003625467,0.0009225608,0.0002546767,0.0005832412,0.0005273409,0.001345093,0.0004499892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002637377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002493866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006184943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001030913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990024,0.0001149779,0.00006625703,0.0001642814,0.0005934142,0.00005872506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992234,0.0003277404,0.00008582437,0.00008027046,0.0002429473,0.0000397046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003548921,0.0000629881,0.000905384,0.0002684834,0.00004854701,0.00006985558,0.00005816759,0.0009553782,0.9795019,0.001028125,0.0002566242,0.01680898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002018054,0.0003319335,0.004578573,0.00002262,0.0000445882,0.0004146766,0.0001043079,0.03279662,0.9555839,0.001196601,0.004847674,0.00005836621],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4160558,0.014064,0.5551858,0.0008140402,0.0007871392,0.0006743973,0.002560476,0.0009828474,0.008875562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6922921,0.008039705,0.2938473,0.0004064007,0.0001426399,0.0005871092,0.0007929812,0.00004801205,0.003843691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001593144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005329609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02626387763006179,"score_gpt":0.2433127792747592,"score_spread":0.2170489016446974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}