{"id":"W4236129338","doi":"10.1149/ma2016-02/46/3423","title":"Electrochemical Approach to Evaluate the Wettability of Rough Surfaces","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ECS Meeting Abstracts","topic":"Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wetting; Contact angle; Capacitance; Materials science; Surface finish; Surface roughness; Electrochemistry; Wetting transition; Surface (topology); Work (physics); Characterization (materials science); Cyclic voltammetry; Composite material; Nanotechnology; Electrode; Chemistry; Thermodynamics; Geometry; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00109544,0.0001537777,0.0001958718,0.00001914932,0.00004741508,0.00001855081,0.0002447414,0.00007228658,0.00001495122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007945086,0.00008591885,0.00005871736,0.0001486856,0.00004705094,0.00006676224,0.00003483966,0.0001270432,0.00005087102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006520202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001796976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001885823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002854392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998656,0.00004548219,0.0003396708,0.0002065023,0.0003916964,0.0003606143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991207,0.0003400283,0.0000331395,0.0003116504,0.00009303456,0.0001014198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000189709,0.00006098145,0.001835915,0.00005827096,0.00003816728,2.665952e-7,0.000165458,0.05981308,0.936951,0.00001782006,0.000208321,0.0008317813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002616445,0.0000250555,0.03075321,0.0001053148,0.00002287628,0.000001417142,0.00003973503,0.002227364,0.965147,0.0002831332,0.0009463386,0.0001869011],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9094888,0.000169099,0.0002567695,0.0002157123,0.0001556358,0.0001794894,0.000002921278,0.0001108203,0.08942073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963702,0.000009398984,0.003473148,0.00001672196,0.00005757995,0.00001859294,7.055146e-7,0.00002412949,0.00002951363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08939122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3503669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02626387763006179,"score_gpt":0.2433127792747592,"score_spread":0.2170489016446974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}