{"id":"W4236560597","doi":"10.1109/wsc.2009.5429239","title":"Meaningful Level of Change in hybrid simulation for construction analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)","topic":"BIM and Construction Integration","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Hybrid system; Set (abstract data type); Limit (mathematics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Discrete event simulation; Event (particle physics); Industrial engineering; Construction industry; Data mining; Simulation; Machine learning; Engineering; Mathematics; Construction engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005308785,0.0006411842,0.0007418907,0.0009303887,0.0007435601,0.002013918,0.001110854,0.0009983359,0.001763989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02151034,0.0005887345,0.001044619,0.0009533909,0.002157733,0.002698284,0.002708927,0.002496652,0.0001945477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001936704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001468123,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003710713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003691332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952192,0.003069213,0.0001879445,0.0003156053,0.0009969514,0.0002110845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863218,0.01033359,0.0007433827,0.001653916,0.0007209717,0.0002263005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001605341,0.0001507798,0.002800934,0.00008262099,0.00004216532,0.00006924506,0.0004394731,0.8632726,0.004092658,0.1100472,0.0004028665,0.01843889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001696374,0.00008090526,0.0002549472,0.00001113911,0.000009190539,0.00001137173,0.00004666985,0.9797515,0.001502301,0.0171417,0.001154804,0.00001853264],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06433016,0.0001367911,0.9297528,0.0003292878,0.00004311974,0.0001446059,0.00006196205,0.0004270121,0.004774279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8120601,0.0001009654,0.1866636,0.00008169505,0.00001698243,0.0002739891,0.00006762096,0.0001223806,0.0006127678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005308785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02807593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.100351446878896,"score_gpt":0.2943295911029265,"score_spread":0.1939781442240305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}