{"id":"W4236681534","doi":"10.18433/j33s4b","title":"Evaluation Outcomes Associated with Alternative Dosing Strategies for Piperacillin/Tazobactam: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences","topic":"Pharmaceutical studies and practices","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Piperacillin/tazobactam; Dosing; Observational study; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Piperacillin; Randomized controlled trial; Tazobactam; MEDLINE; Publication bias; Systematic review; Intensive care medicine; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01277974,0.0007347346,0.008967291,0.0004677239,0.0003882862,0.000287123,0.0005086197,0.0000967409,0.002258996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003915124,0.0003065201,0.003002971,0.001419471,0.000571078,0.0009941235,0.0001015795,0.0007362787,0.000007840483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003409708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001173956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008481451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005537046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921818,0.00189036,0.002233889,0.0005948769,0.002494744,0.0006042863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866263,0.007501325,0.003415718,0.0001951271,0.001703171,0.0005583186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001119196,0.000409647,0.00001806007,0.3616189,0.5641257,0.00006719206,0.00008805288,0.000006775745,0.000002711438,0.0001085212,0.0004974664,0.07294504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001195282,0.0002590635,0.000001189829,0.02676268,0.8051741,0.0001907936,0.00005114993,0.000541236,0.000003655363,0.00006994821,0.1654274,0.0003234894],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007698854,0.991182,0.0003041617,0.003647716,0.0001174726,0.00403519,0.0003344517,0.00001791434,0.0003534055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008156096,0.9961481,0.0003207643,0.002065824,0.0001241714,0.000384863,0.00001407853,0.00003091997,0.00009564993],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3348562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5227434057671534,"score_gpt":0.5841653488630801,"score_spread":0.06142194309592675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}